STAR-CCM+ / THERMAL & CHT

STAR-CCM+ Conjugate Heat Transfer: A Practical CHT Setup Workflow

CHT couples the flow-side energy transport to conduction in solids. The difficult part is usually not enabling energy—it is making sure every heat path, material, interface and boundary condition represents the real system.

ENGINEERING PRINCIPLE

Treat a CHT model as a heat-flow network. Every watt entering the model must have a physically defined path through fluids, solids, interfaces and external boundaries, and the final energy balance should close.

01

Define the thermal domains before selecting models

Identify which volumes are fluid, which are solid and whether any thin component should be represented with a shell or equivalent resistance instead of a full 3D solid. Preserve separate materials where conductivity or heat capacity matters.

02

Audit fluid-solid connectivity

A geometric touch is not enough. Verify that the simulation topology transfers heat across every intended fluid-solid and solid-solid connection. Check interface areas, contact coverage and whether any accidental wall or gap blocks the heat path.

03

Separate loads from heat-transfer responses

Apply known heat generation, heat flux, temperature, convection or radiation conditions according to what is actually known. Avoid imposing both a temperature and a heat rate on the same physical path unless the model formulation explicitly requires it.

04

Close the energy balance

Create reports for heat entering, heat leaving, volumetric sources and storage when transient. Large imbalance usually points to incomplete convergence, a missing boundary contribution, inconsistent sign conventions or an unintended interface.

05

Respect fluid and solid time scales

Fluids can respond much faster than massive solids. For transient thermal problems, choose timestep and simulation duration from the thermal time scales that control the engineering output rather than only from flow convergence.

Run the engineering check

Use the linked Abecator calculator or workflow to turn the setup decision into a quantitative check.

Open Heat Transfer Calculator →
Independence notice:

STAR-CCM+ is a Siemens product name. Abecator is independent and this article is original engineering guidance; it does not reproduce Siemens documentation or third-party tutorial text.

AUTHORITY

CHT: build and audit the complete thermal-resistance path

This section turns the workflow into a quantitative engineering check and an original visual model that can be reused during setup review.

fluidsolidfluid / sinkheat-rate continuity through interfaces
A credible CHT result closes the energy balance across fluid, interface and solid—not just the temperature contour.
ENGINEERING RELATION

Q = ΔT / (1/h_fA + L/kA + 1/h_sA)

  • Q = heat-transfer rate
  • h_f,h_s = fluid-side coefficients
  • L/kA = solid conduction resistance
  • A = transfer area
Worked example:

For A = 0.1 m², h_f = 100 W/m²K, h_s = 50 W/m²K, L = 5 mm, k = 15 W/mK and ΔT = 60 K, the simple resistance model predicts Q ≈ 198 W. A CFD result far from this scale deserves an energy-path audit.

Decision table

Interface temperature jump unexpected

Check contact resistance and interface mapping.

Compare heat flux on both sides.
Solid hotspot shifts with mesh

Refine solid and fluid gradients together.

Check heat-rate sensitivity.
Global energy imbalance

Audit every source, sink and boundary flux.

Do not judge CHT only from temperatures.

Primary / official references

Exact model names and menu locations can change by STAR-CCM+ release; use the official documentation for the installed version when reproducing software steps.

AI Assistance
Contact
TGTelegram