STAR-CCM+ / POST-PROCESSING

STAR-CCM+ Field Functions, Reports and Monitors: Build Results You Can Trust

Post-processing is part of the numerical model. A force, pressure drop, efficiency or heat rate is only meaningful when its field function, integration surface, averaging rule and reference values are defined consistently.

ENGINEERING PRINCIPLE

Use field functions to define quantities, reports to reduce them to engineering numbers, and monitors to show how those numbers evolve. Then make the definitions reusable so design variants are compared on exactly the same basis.

01

Keep field functions dimensional and readable

Build custom expressions from documented quantities and preserve physical dimensions. Use meaningful names and comments for project-specific formulas. A dimensionless-looking expression with hidden unit assumptions is difficult to audit later.

02

Choose the correct reduction operation

Area average, mass-flow average, integral, maximum and minimum answer different questions. Pressure drop, mixing temperature and heat flow should not all use the same averaging method. Define the report from the physics of the measurement.

03

Control the reporting geometry

Use stable planes, boundaries or derived parts that remain valid across design variants. If a reporting plane moves into a recirculation zone or changes area, the trend can reflect post-processing geometry rather than a real design effect.

04

Use monitors for convergence and transients

Monitor the engineering reports during solution. For steady cases, look for drift or oscillation; for transient cases, collect enough physical time to compute meaningful statistics after startup transients have decayed.

05

Design post-processing for reuse

Tags, filters, consistent names and query-based selections make reports less fragile when geometry changes. A reusable simulation template should produce the same evidence package without manual surface re-selection.

Run the engineering check

Use the linked Abecator calculator or workflow to turn the setup decision into a quantitative check.

Open CFD Verification Workflow →
Independence notice:

STAR-CCM+ is a Siemens product name. Abecator is independent and this article is original engineering guidance; it does not reproduce Siemens documentation or third-party tutorial text.

AUTHORITY

Post-processing: make every KPI dimensional, reproducible and area/flow weighted correctly

This section turns the workflow into a quantitative engineering check and an original visual model that can be reused during setup review.

fieldreportmonitor
A reusable report is part of the model definition: its parts, weighting, reference values and units must be as controlled as a boundary condition.
ENGINEERING RELATION

φ̄_A = Σ(φᵢAᵢ) / ΣAᵢ

  • φ̄_A = area-weighted average
  • φᵢ = local field value
  • Aᵢ = contributing face/element area
Worked example:

For temperatures 300, 320 and 340 K over areas 1, 2 and 1 m², the area-weighted average is (300×1 + 320×2 + 340×1)/4 = 320 K. A simple arithmetic average happens to match here, but it will not in general when areas differ.

Decision table

Engineering KPI

Use a report with explicit units, parts and weighting.

Test it on a simple known case.
Convergence monitor

Monitor the report that drives the decision.

Use window/statistics for transient signals.
Design comparison

Keep report definitions identical across variants.

Use Solution History/comparison tools where appropriate.

Primary / official references

Exact model names and menu locations can change by STAR-CCM+ release; use the official documentation for the installed version when reproducing software steps.

AI Assistance
Contact
TGTelegram