ENGINEERING WORKFLOW / 001
CFD Setup Workflow
Enter the core flow and mesh assumptions once. Abecator carries them through Reynolds number, turbulence inlet variables, y+, first-cell height, boundary-layer scale, prism-layer sizing and a convective Courant time-step check.
It connects setup decisions that are usually made in separate calculators.
The result is not a solver-specific prescription. It is an engineering consistency check: the same velocity, fluid properties and characteristic length propagate into Reynolds number, wall shear, turbulence values, prism sizing and transient scales.
That makes contradictions easier to spot before a large CFD model is built.
Flow regime. Re = ρUL/μ establishes the scale used by the wall-shear check.
Turbulence inlet. k, ε and ω use the supplied intensity and length-scale assumptions.
Near-wall mesh. y = y+ν/uτ provides the first-cell estimate, followed by geometric prism growth.
Transient scale. Δt = Co·Δx/U provides a convective Courant starting point.
Move from setup arithmetic into CFD diagnosis.
Separated flow, roughness, rotation, strong pressure gradients, multiphase physics and complex wall treatments can invalidate simple correlations.
y+ misses the target
Diagnose why the solved near-wall behavior differs from the pre-mesh estimate.
Read case → TECHNICAL CASEPrism layers collapse
Review geometry, surface mesh and growth settings when the intended wall stack disappears.
Read case → CONSULTINGCFD model review
Use project-specific support when a setup needs more than an engineering correlation.
View capability →